Tell me more ×
Raspberry Pi Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users and developers of hardware and software for Raspberry Pi. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 6 down vote favorite

I downloaded the Archlinux arm .img file for the Raspberry Pi and installed it onto my SD card.

Is it possible to use a different partition instead of FAT16 that is in the .img? or will the GPU not detect it at all?

I ask because it would be huge performance boost if I could use squashfs as the boot partition.

share|improve this question
Welcome to RaspberryPi.SE :) I hope you don't mind, I added the archlinux tag to your post to help other Arch users like ourselves find it. – Jivings♦ Jul 3 '12 at 1:21
Technically it's Archlinux arm but thanks anyway for inserting the tag. :D – ArchHaskeller Jul 3 '12 at 1:27
Don't worry, the ARM architecture is implied. – Jivings♦ Jul 3 '12 at 1:28
@Haskeller Why don't you want it to be FAT? It is a small partition, with no writes. – Alex Chamberlain Jul 3 '12 at 8:07
File permissions,time stamps, and read performance improvements(loading kernel). – ArchHaskeller Jul 3 '12 at 17:36
show 2 more comments

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

This is the only mention of the boot partition I can find in the chip documentation:

The split between ARM and GPU memory is selected by installing one of the supplied start*.elf files as start.elf in the FAT32 boot partition of the SD card.

Therefore I assume it will only read FAT.

Just found this on the Raspberry Pi forums:

There is firmware on the SOC that you will not be able to touch. It is pre-programed from the factory. And yes it is required to boot, and this is why the first partition has to be FAT because this is how the firmware is designed. You only need a FAT partition big enough to hold a bootloader of some type.

share|improve this answer
Does Broadcom have any other versions of GPU firmware that will load the Archlinux arm kernel on a filesystem besides FAT? – ArchHaskeller Jul 3 '12 at 1:48
I assume the root partition isn't FAT? – Alex Chamberlain Jul 3 '12 at 6:25
@AlexChamberlain: Root partition is EXT4. – Jivings♦ Jul 3 '12 at 8:05
@Haskeller: Not as far as I am aware. What is your use case? – Jivings♦ Jul 3 '12 at 8:05
@Jivings I thought it would be... – Alex Chamberlain Jul 3 '12 at 8:06
show 2 more comments
up vote 1 down vote

To answer your question in the most literal sense, the partition could be FAT32, instead of FAT16. The Debian image uses FAT32.

share|improve this answer
Pretty sure Arch is also FAT32 and OP was mistaken. – Jivings♦ Jul 12 '12 at 8:42
@Jivings Nope, it is definitely FAT16. You can use piimg list. – Alex Chamberlain Jul 12 '12 at 8:46

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.