Timeline for What's the better choice to prevent wear leveling?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/ with https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 4:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 2:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 21, 2016 at 15:43 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 22, 2016 at 6:14 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 9:46 | comment | added | flakeshake | The wear leveling implementations of consumer SD cards are top-secret. Furthermore in the consumer arena vendors propably change them secretly from batch to batch without scruples. | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 9:44 | answer | added | Milliways | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 9:15 | comment | added | goobering | Given the low cost of one or two units of each card, would it perhaps make sense just to run a test? | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 9:03 | history | edited | goobering | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Amended 100.000 -> 100,000
|
| Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 | history | asked | Simon Kemper | CC BY-SA 3.0 |