Timeline for Would ZRAM be helpful for running OpenCV?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2019 at 6:08 | history | edited | Stuart Naylor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Mar 27, 2019 at 5:18 | comment | added | Stuart Naylor | @Dmitry Grigoryev your comment is as puzzling as yes its absolutely obvious to my affiliation. Check the bug reports on ubuntu with zram-config and the questions that they failed to answer. Zram-config is an extremely bad implementation that is even incorrect in name as all it does is some bad illogical swaps. | |
| Mar 27, 2019 at 5:07 | comment | added | Stuart Naylor | LZO / LZ4 are extremely fast and low load compression algs, when you have av load you barely notice zram in operation. When you have intense load any extra cpu load just adds to the process queue. If you are maxed out on load then zram can be a negative, spare ticks which yeah is bad slang by me and its great as the minimal load increase will not be noticed. | |
| Mar 26, 2019 at 15:49 | comment | added | ConcernedHobbit | I don't quite understand what you mean by "Zram likes spare ticks as the compression even though light creates load". Could you elaborate? | |
| Mar 26, 2019 at 11:59 | comment | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | You forgot to mention your affiliation with that Github project (though it's obvious). I also find troubling that you berate someone else's implementation in favor of yours, while providing zero information as to why yours is better. | |
| Mar 26, 2019 at 10:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 26, 2019 at 12:02 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2019 at 10:45 | history | answered | Stuart Naylor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |