This might seem like a strange question, but does anyone know the reason for the camera driver not be implemented as a SoC camera driver?

For those not familiar with this, it is a framework that uses V4L2 for cameras that use connections that aren't USB, PCI, etc. It seems that in this case this would be a perfect fit.


In what way is the bcm2835-v4l2 driver not an SoC camera driver?

i.e. this:


  • Because it's only using the V4L2 API and not the Soc-Camera Subsystem (based on the V4L2 API)
    – Jamiro14
    May 7 '15 at 18:21
  • Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference. Oct 5 '15 at 1:05

UV4L does have the raspicam V4L2 driver (and many other useful plug-in's)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.