How much power does the PiZero consume on it's lowest possible cpu clock setting (underclocked)? (Let's say the only usb add on is a wifi dongle.) And... is it worth it?

  • What is your intended application? Is it battery powered? If saving electrical cost (not battery powered) there is no real benefit to be had. Earlier models were calculated to cost approximately $12 per year. Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 23:41
  • no application yet... but yes battery powered.. just getting ideas for mobile-like applications Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 23:42
  • The need for a WiFi dongle would probably make this a zero sum game. But, without a project, the tradeoffs are large unknowns. Also without a plan it would be hard to say a bigger battery would not be a better alternative. Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 23:43
  • from this reference: raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-zero/#comment-1249148 80mA idling on a pizero (no dongle of course). Let's take out the wifi dongle idea for the tests and see how low it can get.... Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 23:50
  • Some tips here.
    – Jamie Bull
    Commented Dec 8, 2015 at 2:54

3 Answers 3


Underclocking modern ARM cores usually brings little benefit. While lower clock frequency (and perhaps lower core voltage) do reduce power consumption, a core clocked to the nominal frequency runs faster, meaning it spends less time in active state and more time in sleep, which is a more efficient* way of saving energy than permanently running underclocked.

I remember playing with clock settings on a Banana Pi under moderate load (video playback) and checking current consumption via /sys/class/power_supply/. Differences I observed were smaller than the measurement fluctuations.

(*) efficient in the sense that you still have full CPU performance available when you need it.


• power measurement chart of the Pi-Zero: less than the RaspPi A version. https://plus.google.com/post/z13wuzkavtb1f3hnc224ifgq4oehi1mmg

  • 3
    Welcome to Raspberry Pi! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference. Commented Dec 8, 2015 at 3:03
  • I believe the author of this blog article didn't underclock anything, he just compared power consumption of all the PIs under different load. Commented Dec 9, 2015 at 6:59
  • The document is no longer avai;able :( Commented Jun 10, 2021 at 13:15

According to this forum post, fixing the CPU frequency at 600MHz (no more turboing to 1GHz) on a Pi Zero 2 W did save total consuming power:

With default settings, a 4-core prime number benchmark took 413 seconds to run, averaging 2.07W of power draw and in total consuming 0.237Wh of energy.

With the underclock and undervolt, it took 691 seconds to run, averaging 1.06W of power draw and in total consuming 0.204Wh of energy.

Thats an energy reduction of about 14%. It may be possible to do even better than this with a more aggressive undervolt.

These are the settings for the /boot/config.txt


WARNING: setting over_voltage and over_voltage_min to -8, disabled wlan0. Please caution while fiddling with these settings.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.