Can the NRF24L01+ (+PA +LNA) be used for video transmission?

I want to build a quadcopter that would provide video surveillance; how possible is it to use the NRF24L01+ module for video transmission using raspberry pi?

  • 1
    Looks like it's been achieved using h265 here youtu.be/9N1uRcvZzq4 Currently looking into it for your same purpose
    – LollosoSi
    Commented Apr 13, 2023 at 13:24

3 Answers 3


Looks implausible to me. There are some video clips at letsmakerobots.com that illustrate the sort of performance you might expect, which looks like 320x240 at about 1 fps. They used it for a slow moving ground based robot - I can't imagine it would be fun to try to pilot a quadcopter at that frame rate.

The product page suggests that the chip may be capable of up to 2Mbps. By the time you've added up overhead/packet loss/etc. you're not likely to achieve usable results.


I've done some experimentation with the NRF24L01 for exactly this. Using the python API & auto-ack/retransmit etc, I got about 6500 bytes/s! Absolute garbage for video.

So I tried again using a C program & all settings tweaked/disabled to squeeze every bit of perf & optimization out of it I could get. I finally got 1.7Mb/s out of it, and I got about 300 feet away with lots of obstructions before any drastic packet loss.

Next step - how to get a decent frame rate on the 320x240 PiTFT, 16 bit color. That's just over 2 frames a second at 1.7Mbit. With interlacing & skipping every 2nd row, you can get about 11 FPS. You could quantize further too if you didn't mind going a bit more retro to be a bit more responsive.

It is possible, but it's the wrong tool for the job :D it's a great low powered module for sending & receiving reliable data, but kind of unsuitable for streaming HD. I hope to write a blog about my bot one day, I really should cover how I did this.

  • Note that the 1.7Mb/s is one-way only. To have input going the other way required lots of... awkward synchronization, filthy compromises & bad dreams.
    – nevelis
    Commented Feb 7, 2017 at 7:27

I suggest to take a look into WiFiBroadcast instead.

It uses COTS Wifi dongles , uses error correction and has many advantages if you only need to send :



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.