1

I want to count pulses and find the frequency. Here is the picture of pulses from the oscilloscope:

enter image description here

Obviously, frequency is around 1/2.3 ms = 420 Hz.

First I tried this program:

import RPi.GPIO as GPIO
import time
GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
GPIO.setwarnings(False)
GPIO.setup(26,GPIO.IN)
ecnt=0

def evnt(channel):
    global ecnt
    ecnt += 1

GPIO.add_event_detect(26, GPIO.RISING, callback=evnt)

while(True):
    estr=ecnt
    time.sleep(10)
    efin=ecnt
    print((efin-estr)/10)

Program returns frequencies around 1200 Hz!

I also tried this program:

import pigpio
import time

mypi=pigpio.pi()

mypi.set_mode(26, pigpio.INPUT)

wind_cb = mypi.callback(26)

while(True):
    estr=wind_cb.tally()
    time.sleep(10)
    efin=wind_cb.tally()
    print((efin-estr)/10)

This program returns frequency of 470 Hz, which is much better but still about 10% to much.

On suggestion from @joan I tried this

import pigpio

mypi=pigpio.pi()

mypi.set_mode(26, pigpio.INPUT)

ecnt=0
edat=[0,0]

def evnt(gpio,level,tick):
    global ecnt
    global edat
    if level == 1:
        ecnt += 1
        edat=[ecnt,tick]

cb = mypi.callback(26,pigpio.RISING_EDGE,evnt)

while(True):
    estr=edat
    time.sleep(10)
    efin=edat
    tdif=pigpio.tickDiff(estr[1],efin[1])/1000000.0
    if (tdif>0):
        freq=(efin[0]-estr[0])/tdif
    else:
        freq=0
    print(freq)

cb.cancel()
mypi.stop()

This makes minor improvement (time between two events is actually 10.03s and not 10s), so it still gives 10% higher frequency than it should.

What is wrong, what should I do?

4
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – goldilocks
    Sep 2, 2018 at 9:39
  • I want to notify an interested reader that I found the solution for the problem. Currently interest for this question (upvote indicator) is zero, however if interest rises enough, I will post the answer with programming sample and extensive explanation.
    – Pygmalion
    Sep 4, 2018 at 13:27
  • ..so you're holding the answer hostage?
    – tedder42
    Apr 7, 2019 at 23:31
  • @tedder42 Ehm, I thought nobody is interested, so why bother. And now I don't remember what exactly was wrong. If you are interested, I can post the last code I and is probably OK.
    – Pygmalion
    Apr 8, 2019 at 18:11

1 Answer 1

1

Below is the working example. There are two adaptations of the original code:

  1. For some reason RISING EDGE option of pigpio does not work properly. Fortunately, EITHER EDGE works fine, but you have to divide the result by 2 because one cycle has one rising and one falling edge.
  2. Falling edge in my case is not as sharp as rising edge. In order to prevent false falling edge event, I added a filter that prevents two events happening sooner than 50 microseconds.

Hope this helps.

import pigpio
import time

mypi=pigpio.pi()

mypi.set_mode(26, pigpio.INPUT)

save=0
ecnt=0
edat=[0,0]

def evnt(gpio,level,tick):
    global save
    global ecnt
    global edat
    if (level<2) and (tick-save>50):
        save=tick
        ecnt += 1
        edat=[ecnt,tick]

cb = mypi.callback(26,pigpio.EITHER_EDGE,evnt)

while(True):
    estr=edat
    time.sleep(1)
    efin=edat
    tdif=pigpio.tickDiff(estr[1],efin[1])/1000000.0
    if (tdif>0):
        freq=(efin[0]-estr[0])/2/tdif
    else:
        freq=0
    print(freq)

cb.cancel()
mypi.stop()

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.