Timeline for Raspberry Pi Model B 3 Overclocking?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2016 at 11:00 | comment | added | goldilocks♦ | Good answer but just to stress this for people who did not bother reading the "binning" article, some emphasis: "bet many of them could safely hit the 1.5 GHz mark" does NOT mean if later on you read someone else did it without problems that the same will be true for you. The OEM's number is the one they consider safe for all units. Some may be capable of higher speeds whereas others may fail, meaning fused internal circuits == dead pi 3. Put another way, if Bob says, "Yeah I run mine at 1.8 Ghz", you try it, and your machine gets bricked it is your own fault. | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 23:29 | comment | added | Jacobm001 | @PatrickCook: for architecture purposes, I was referring to the newer ARM instruction set. It would make sense that they'll probably hesitate to upgrade to the newer set immediately, but anything you compile can take advantage of the newer hardware. | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 23:27 | comment | added | Patrick Cook | The organization has stated that their OSs and programs will still be 32 bit based, for a while at least. Does that mean most programs won't be compiled for that architecture? | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 21:00 | history | answered | Jacobm001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |