You should check whether the f3 tests measure just sequential read-write or random read-write performance as well.
In most real use cases, random read and write performance is more important since it is the class of transfer operations being utilized when large amounts of files are copy/pasted or when software is downloaded and installed.
I have had bad experience with Intenso USB drives and SD cards in the past. While their sequential transfer operations are satisfactory and meet minimum specifications, it seems that random read-write performance is abysmal.
I have had to wait for nearly an hour to copy a large directory into Intenso's USB 3.0 32 GB USB stick. The same operation took a little more than 5 minutes on Kingston and SanDisk drives.
While I haven't used Intenso microSD cards for RPis, I did use them to boot and run Linux on an Intel Cyclone V SoCFPGA kit and ASUS Tinkerboard. Performance was sluggish and was remedied when I reverted to Transcend or SanDisk cards.
You will notice that while Intenso's USB drive and SD cards have a good average rating on Amazon, the top rated reviews are universally bad. Usual complaints include sluggish performance and bad reliability.
You can find quite a few bad reviews of Intenso products. In this video, a customer shares his experience with a microSD card. While I'm not sure if similar videos exist for cards, there are plenty of videos recording the benchmarks achieved by Intenso's USB drives. While some report satisfactory performance, others report horrible write performance. Here is one benchmarking video by a reputed German tech store.
In order to verify the performance of your specific microSD card unit, you can use a diagnostic utility detailed in the linked Raspberry Pi official blog, and check whether it satisfies target read-write operation thresholds.