0

I set hostname of my Raspberry Pi 3 to "myhost", avahi is running ok (systemctl confirmed, to run with myhost.local).

From my Ubuntu WSL on Windows 10 I can ssh to the RPi with ssh pi@myhost and that works, but ssh [email protected] does not. Similarly, from Windows cmd, nslookup myhost gives correct IP, but nslookup myhost.local says Non-existent domain. Why? Every tutorial on the net says to ssh with ".local".

In any case, I started a simple web server in node.js:

const http = require('http');

const hostname = '192.168.1.25';   
const port = 3000;

const server = http.createServer((req, res) =>   {
    res.statusCode = 200;
    res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'text/plain');
    res.end('Hello World');
});

server.listen(port, hostname, () =>    {
    console.log(`Server running at http://${hostname}:${port}/`);
});

And when I open Firefox and type http://192.168.1.25:3000/ - it works, I see "Hello World". But if I type http://myhost:3000 or http://myhost.local:3000/ - it doesn't work (no server found).

However, from Ubuntu console on the same Windows, both wget 192.168.1.25:3000 and wget http://myhost:3000 - work.

Windows resolves the domain correctly, i.e. nslookup myhost gives the correct IP, so why Firefox (or Chrome) cannot connect??

3
  • Are you using apache or apache2 with this?
    – user123730
    Commented Sep 26, 2020 at 0:10
  • 1
    This is a Windows problem.
    – Milliways
    Commented Sep 26, 2020 at 1:43
  • I'm not using apache at all. For server just Node JS.
    – zupazt3
    Commented Sep 26, 2020 at 16:33

1 Answer 1

2

There are mainly three services used for name resolution in a network, in particular together with MS Window$:

  1. DNS (Domain Name Service) the main name service all over the world, supported by any internet provider. It resolve hierarchical organized names like raspberrypi.stackexchange.com.
  2. mDNS (multicast DNS) an auto configuring name resolution service, but only usable on one local network with same ip address range (broadcast domain). mDNS cannot pass router. It resolve names within the reserved DNS domain .local, e.g. raspberrypi.local.
  3. LLMNR (Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution) a service made by Microsoft and supported by Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10 and systemd-networkd. It is also only usable on a broadcast domain. It resolve the simple hostname, e.g. raspberrypi.

It is difficult to examine with your description what services in what combination is running on what device. But to shine a light on this, I have made some tests so you may be able to understand how your name resolution (should) work(s).

I have a Laptop as testing device, configured with systemd-networkd, because that supports all services. The tested Raspberry Pi 4B is setup with the default Raspberry Pi OS (32-bit) Lite 2020-08-20, updated with sudo apt update && sudo apt full-upgrade && sudo reboot at 2020-09-26. Both are connected wired to my local network with router and switches.

Test for DNS

Setting on the Laptop. You get only an address resolution for google.com, not for raspberrypi.local and raspberrypi.

laptop ~$ cat /etc/systemd/network/04-wired.network
[Match]
Name=ens1

[Network]
LLMNR=no
MulticastDNS=no
DHCP=ipv4

[DHCP]
UseDNS=yes

laptop ~$ resolvectl status ens1
Link 2 (ens1)
      Current Scopes: DNS
DefaultRoute setting: yes
       LLMNR setting: no
MulticastDNS setting: no
  DNSOverTLS setting: no
      DNSSEC setting: no
    DNSSEC supported: no
  Current DNS Server: 84.200.69.80
         DNS Servers: 84.200.69.80
                      84.200.70.40

laptop ~$ resolvectl query google.com
google.com: 216.58.206.14                      -- link: ens1
            2a00:1450:4001:81f::200e           -- link: ens1

-- Information acquired via protocol DNS in 10.4583s.
-- Data is authenticated: no
laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi.local
raspberrypi.local: resolve call failed: No appropriate name servers or networks for name found
laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi
raspberrypi: resolve call failed: No appropriate name servers or networks for name found

Test for mDNS

Setting on the Laptop. You only get an address resolution for raspberrypi.local, not for google.com and raspberrypi.

laptop ~$ cat /etc/systemd/network/04-wired.network
[Match]
Name=ens1

[Network]
LLMNR=no
MulticastDNS=yes
DHCP=ipv4

[DHCP]
UseDNS=no

laptop ~$ resolvectl status ens1
Link 2 (ens1)
      Current Scopes: mDNS/IPv4
DefaultRoute setting: no
       LLMNR setting: no
MulticastDNS setting: yes
  DNSOverTLS setting: no
      DNSSEC setting: no
    DNSSEC supported: no

laptop ~$ resolvectl query google.com
google.com: resolve call failed: No appropriate name servers or networks for name found
laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi.local
raspberrypi.local: 192.168.50.60               -- link: ens1

-- Information acquired via protocol mDNS/IPv4 in 59.9ms.
-- Data is authenticated: no
laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi
raspberrypi: resolve call failed: No appropriate name servers or networks for name found

Test for LLMNR

Setting on the Laptop. You do not get any address resolution if using the default Raspberry Pi OS image. You get a response for raspberrypi if configured for LLMNR.

laptop ~$ cat /etc/systemd/network/04-wired.network
[Match]
Name=ens1

[Network]
LLMNR=yes
MulticastDNS=no
DHCP=ipv4

[DHCP]
UseDNS=no

laptop ~$ resolvectl status ens1
Link 2 (ens1)
      Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4
DefaultRoute setting: no
       LLMNR setting: yes
MulticastDNS setting: no
  DNSOverTLS setting: no
      DNSSEC setting: no
    DNSSEC supported: no

laptop ~$ resolvectl query google.com
google.com: resolve call failed: No appropriate name servers or networks for name found
laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi.local
raspberrypi.local: resolve call failed: No appropriate name servers or networks for name found
laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi
raspberrypi: resolve call failed: 'raspberrypi' not found

As expected, the default Raspberry Pi OS image does not support LLMNR out of the box. I don't know why your RasPi is responding to a single myhost. Do you use a default Raspberry Pi OS on it? To verify it, I have reconfigured my RasPi to systemd-networkd and enabled LLMNR on it. The Result is:

laptop ~$ resolvectl query raspberrypi
raspberrypi: 192.168.50.60                     -- link: ens1

-- Information acquired via protocol LLMNR/IPv4 in 110.0ms.
-- Data is authenticated: no

Of course you can combine all services but it doesn't make troubleshooting easier.

4
  • Thanks for interesting answer. I spend so much time debugging now, but to no avail. I've changed host name and now even nslookup doesn't show. Also, I cannot SSH now from my WSL with "ssh pi@myhostmy" (or .local) - the new domain. It doesn't resolve. I set the static IP so I can access my RPi. Avahi seems to be happy with itself - says it's working and serving myhostmy.local - but it doesn't work... Even when I execute host myhostmy or host myhostmy.local on the RPi itself it cannot find IP. It doesn't even see itself. I got really tired, I guess I have to be happy with static IP.
    – zupazt3
    Commented Sep 26, 2020 at 17:30
  • Also, I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that I'm using WiFi on RPi. Although I connected a cable - and it didn't change anything. And nslookup myhost on Win and host myhost on Linux still shows correct IPs (for wlan0 and eth0) - even though this host (myhost) doesn't exist anymore (it's myhostmy now). I tried flushing DNS but it still shows old one, while it cannot find a new one.
    – zupazt3
    Commented Sep 26, 2020 at 17:32
  • @zupazt3 You only focus on DNS but not on mDNS and LLMNR. nslookup and host only query DNS. You should use resolvectl. I suggest to troubleshoot structured. Flash a SD Card with an unmodified RaspiOS Lite and boot the RasPi with it. Then use a another device (Laptop, PC, second RasPi) and configure it with systemd-networkd. Then repeat the tests I have shown. Now you know what is working on the RasPi. Next try to connect from your other devices. Then you know what they support.
    – Ingo
    Commented Sep 27, 2020 at 8:37
  • Seems like a logical solution. I will try this when I have some time to get back to this. Right now I guess I'd be happy with static IP and assigning it to a name using "host" file in Windows.
    – zupazt3
    Commented Sep 27, 2020 at 12:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.